| 不同方法计算胶南市河流纳污能力结果的比较 |
| Compared with different methods of calculated seasonal river pollution receiving capacity of Jiaonan |
| 投稿时间：2010-07-05 修订日期：2010-07-05 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词:季节性河流 纳污能力 常规模型 拦河闸坝 |
| 英文关键词:Seasonal river Pollution receiving capacity Conventional model Barrage |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 2264 |
| 全文下载次数: 2354 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 胶南市１１条河流１３个水功能区中，不同河段建有拦河闸或属感潮河段，分别采用常规模型和根据河道水力特性采用相应模型计算了水体纳污力。常规方法计算值比考虑受拦河闸等影响计算值ＣＯＤ少３１．０８％ ～９７５３％、氨氮少１０．５０％ ～８２．６９％。从总体纳污能力看，采用常规方法在９０％设计条件下比考虑受拦河闸等影响综合计算９０％设计条件下的纳污能力ＣＯＤ少５７．３１％和氨氮少２６．４５％。建有梯级拦河闸坝的季节性河流在
计算河道纳污能力时，拦河闸坝是一项不可忽视的因素。
|
| 英文摘要: |
| Among 13 water function zone of 11 rivers in Jiaonan，different reach were tidal rivers or built barrages. Conventional model and corresponding model with river hydraulic characteristic were used to calculate pollution receiving capacity of water bodies. The quantity of COD calculated by conventional method reduced 31. 08%-97. 53 % comparing with the method which considers the influence of barrages，and ammonia's quantity reduced10.50%-82. 69%. From the point of collectivity pollution receiving capacity，in 90% design conditions，the quantity of COD and ammonia which using conventional method reduced 57.31% and 26.45% comparing with integration method considering the influence of barrages. The barrages are not neglect able factor when calculating the pollution receiving capacity of water bodies of seasonal rivers with cascade barrage.
|
| 王成见,孟春霞,赵秀春,马振宇.2010.不同方法计算胶南市河流纳污能力结果的比较[J].水生态学杂志,31(4):123-126. |
| 查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 HTML |
